ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025
Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Urine Cytology for Noninvasive Detection of Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multi-Center Diagnostic Study with Prospective Validation.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management and Treatment Strategies for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Current Insights.Research and reports in urology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Urine Cytology for Noninvasive Detection of Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multi-Center Diagnostic Study with Prospective Validation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate preoperative diagnosis of muscle invasion (MI) is critical for urothelial carcinoma (UC) management. The aim is to evaluate whether artificial intelligence (AI) model based on urine cytology can accurately detect MIUC and compare its performance with radiologist assessments. UC patients underwent liquid-based urine cytology from four centers are included for model development/validation. Performance of the precision urine cytology AI solution for MI (PUCAS-M) is validated across multicenter cohorts and compared to radiologists' assessments (including CT/MR, MR accounted for 40.7%). Clinical utility is assessed for initial diagnosis, recurrence detection, and neoadjuvant therapy. PUCAS-M achieves an area under the receiver operation curve (AUROC) of 0.857 (95% CI: 0.820-0.895) in the whole validation cohort, which is significantly higher (P-value = 0.005) than radiologists (0.773, 95% CI: 0.727-0.818). The integration of radiologists' diagnosis and PUCAS-M (mPUCAS-M) significantly increases the sensitivity of radiologists from 63.9% to 83.3% in bladder cancer and from 76.9% to 90.3% in upper-tract UC. Lastly, in the neoadjuvant therapy subgroups, mPUCAS-M maintains an improved AUROC (ranging from 0.857-0.865), whereas radiologist assessments' performance decline. PUCAS-M provides accurate, non-invasive MI detection method, particularly valuable for equivocal imaging. Integration with clinical data enhances diagnostic precision, offering a scalable solution for UC management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.