ArticlePM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation2026
Access to assistive technology in pediatric brain injury care: Narrative perspectives of clinicians, vendors, and parents.
Article in PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe critical need for assistive technology (AT) for children with brain injury is recognized. Despite its importance, there is scant literature on how delays and denials in the provision of AT affect recovery and rehabilitation.
objectiveTo examine the complex ecosystem of AT usage and barriers to access, drawing upon the perspectives of clinicians, vendors, and parents in an exploratory qualitative study.
designThis is a companion study to a quantitative retrospective medical chart review using grounded theory methods. Two focus groups with clinical staff, one focus group with vendors, and six interviews with parents of children with brain injury were conducted. The narrative data were combined to maximize the triangulation of themes.
settingPediatric rehabilitation hospital.
participantsMultidisciplinary rehabilitation clinicians, vendors who provide AT, and parents of children with brain injury.
resultsPrimary themes included coordinating with insurance, vendors, and funding; fostering age-appropriate independence; family's familiarity with AT; understanding the dynamic nature of development and recovery; impact on family relationships; costs/financial considerations; accepting role of AT; discovering new AT; accepting child's reality; and advocating for AT access.
conclusionThe ethical implications of delays in access to AT, particularly in children with maturing and recovering brains, are far reaching and bring to the forefront concerns about the potential impact of disability stigma, social justice, and access to devices and information and the importance of maximizing self-determination and enabling independence and autonomy. Delays in access to AT preclude both a child's rights and capabilities, adversely affecting their recovery and maturation and limiting their integration into society under disability law.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.