ArticleClinical transplantation2025
Addition of a Temporary Portocaval Shunt Does Not Reduce Acute Kidney Injury in Caval-Sparing Liver Transplantation.
Article in Clinical transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Temporary Portocaval Shunts During Liver Transplantation: A Narrative Review of Technical Solutions and Post-Transplant Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication following liver transplantation (LT), with multifactorial etiology. It is believed that perioperative hemodynamic instability could lead to AKI. A temporary portocaval shunt (TPCS) could possibly prevent this, but its beneficial effect is still controversial, especially in caval-sparing LT. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate whether the use of a TPCS during hepatectomy reduces the incidence and severity of post-LT AKI in caval-sparing LT, defined according to AKIN criteria. Between January 2005 and August 2023, all orthotopic LTs performed in a single center were retrospectively analyzed and were divided into a TPCS group (n = 134) and a no-TPCS group (n = 260). Serum creatinine was collected right before LT and daily during the first week post-LT. In multivariate analysis, TPCS was not related to AKI, while diabetes mellitus (p = 0.01) and LabMELD (p = 0.02) were. When comparing TPCS and no-TPCS groups, no differences were seen in median increase of serum creatinine post-LT (TPCS; 12 µmol/L (-4-52) versus no-TPCS; 14 µmol/L ± (-3-52) (p = 0.94)), number of post-LT AKI (TPCS; 31% versus no-TPCS; 33% (p = 0.57)), or severity of post-LT AKI (p = 0.90). In conclusion, the application of a TPCS during hepatectomy is not associated with less post-LT AKI or less severe post-LT AKI when using a caval-sparing LT technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.