ReviewThe Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi2025
Combating Post-colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer: Insight from the Trials and Cohort Studies.
Review in The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant global health concern, being the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death. A colonoscopy examination is central to CRC prevention, enabling screening and adenoma removal. Nevertheless, the emergence of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC), which is a CRC diagnosed after a colonoscopy that initially found no malignancy, highlights the critical gaps in the quality of current colonoscopy practices. Missed lesions, particularly those with a non-polypoid morphology or in the proximal colon, are the leading cause of PCCRC, accounting for approximately 80% of cases. Efforts to combat PCCRC focused on enhancing the colonoscopy quality through measurable indicators and developing novel technologies to improve the colonoscopy performance. Evidence of how these interventions are associated with the PCCRC risk is critical for endoscopists to obtain the best efficacy from colonoscopy screening. This review summarizes current clinical studies regarding this issue, focusing on randomized control trials and cohort studies to identify the future direction of clinical research on preventing PCCRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.