ReviewLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2025
The Oral Health Disparity Among Refugee Children: A Systematic Review.
Review in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Oral Health Disparity Among Refugee Children: A Systematic Review.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We sought to understand oral health problems among refugee children resettled in developed nations and determine best practices for addressing them. Methods: A systematic review was performed and reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A comprehensive search was performed using the PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus databases from 1980 through 2024 using Medical Subject Heading terms: "children," "refugee," and "oral health," and a separate search in which "oral health" was replaced with "dental caries." Interventional, qualitative, and epidemiological studies about children resettled in developed nations were included. Critical study appraisal was done using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) tool developed at Oxford University. Final data were synthesized in tables and graphs, depicting the study designs, locations, dates of data collection, sample sizes, sample characteristics, and major findings. Results: Of 30 studies, 25 analyzed oral health in refugee children directly, and six were qualitative studies interviewing parents/caregivers and key informants. Twelve cross-sectional studies included clinical exams, identifying as many as 78% of refugee children with dental caries. Eight studies comparing refugee children to age-and sex-matched children in respective developed countries showed refugee status conferred significantly worse oral health. Two interventional studies demonstrated that parental education improved knowledge but did not improve children's oral health, whereas oral screenings at dedicated refugee health clinics facilitated children receiving referrals and completing treatment. Review data was limited by the lack of standardized or comprehensive measures of oral health. Conclusions: The refugee pediatric population is at higher risk of oral disease than nonrefugee immigrant and native-born patient populations. Developed nations should address this disparity with community and healthcare partnerships and research, particularly prospective and interventional studies. Otolaryngologists care for the clinical consequences of poor oral health and hygiene and therefore share responsibility in facilitating preventive efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.