ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2025
Type 2 immune responses are associated with less severe COVID-19 in a hospitalized cohort.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
47 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The novel coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spread rapidly after its identification in December 2019 to cause a global pandemic. The respiratory tract is the primary site of infection, and there is a large range in the severity of respiratory illnesses caused by the virus. Defining molecular and cellular factors for protection from severe disease and death has been a goal to better understand and to predict and mitigate the effects of SARS-CoV-2 and future coronaviruses. Objective: Despite well-known susceptibilities to respiratory viral infections, respiratory allergy and allergic asthma have not been identified as risk factors for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in most epidemiologic studies and may be protective. We sought to investigate associations between markers of type 2 (T2) immune responses with SARS-CoV-2 clinical outcomes and virus loads in a cohort of 1164 individuals hospitalized for COVID-19 from May 2020 to March 2021 as part of the IMPACC study. Methods: We characterized the clinical outcomes, as defined by severity trajectory groups reflecting the degree of respiratory support required, virus loads, and antibody titers of COVID-19 infections in IMPACC participants in relation to molecular and cellular markers of T2 immune responses through multiple assays, including, (1) IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 levels in serum Olink data, (2) T2 cellular signatures in blood cytometry by time of flight data, (3) relative quantification of T2 signaling gene pathways in airway RNA sequencing data, and/or (4) T2 pathways in peripheral blood mononuclear cell RNA sequencing data. We also investigated the outcomes of individuals with self-reported asthma and evidence of T2 immune responses. Results: The diagnosis of asthma (odd ratio = 1.27), elevated serum T2 cytokine levels (median fold change = 1.06), and a higher frequency of T Conclusion: T2 immune responses were associated with lower virus loads and more favorable clinical outcomes, suggesting that T2 inflammation related to asthma and allergic diseases may have a direct protective effect against SARS-CoV-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.