ArticleHemaSphere2025
Clonal hematopoiesis in AML long-term survivors: Risk factors and clinical consequences.
Article in HemaSphere, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clonal Hematopoiesis does not influence manufacturing of Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cells.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is common in the general population and associated with various health risks, but its prevalence and clinical implications in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) long-term survivors (LTS; ≥5-year survival) are unknown. We analyzed CH in 373 AML-LTS with a median 11.6-year follow-up from diagnosis using a sensitive targeted sequencing assay based on single-molecule molecular inversion probes. CH variants were detected in 61.9% of survivors, with 26% having small-clone CH (SC-CH, variant allele frequency (VAF) < 2%) and 35.9% CH of indeterminate potential (≥2% VAF). CH was more prevalent in survivors treated with chemotherapy only (75.7%) compared to those who received allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT, 54.0%) and to age group-matched healthy controls. In chemotherapy-treated survivors, CH prevalence increased with age, whereas in alloSCT recipients, it most closely associated with hematopoietic age (i.e., the sum of donor age and time since transplantation). The variant spectrum also differed by treatment, with
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.