ArticleArXiv2025
Real-time, inline quantitative MRI enabled by scanner-integrated machine learning: a proof of principle with NODDI.
Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe clinical feasibility and translation of many advanced quantitative MRI (qMRI) techniques are inhibited by their restriction to 'research mode', due to resource-intensive, offline parameter estimation. This work aimed to achieve 'clinical mode' qMRI, by real-time, inline parameter estimation with a trained neural network (NN) fully integrated into a vendor's image reconstruction environment, therefore facilitating and encouraging clinical adoption of advanced qMRI techniques.
methodsThe Siemens Image Calculation Environment (ICE) pipeline was customised to deploy trained NNs for advanced diffusion MRI parameter estimation with Open Neural Network Exchange (ONNX) Runtime. Two fully-connected NNs were trained offline with data synthesised with the neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) model, using either conventionally estimated (NNMLE) or ground truth (NNGT) parameters as training labels. The strategy was demonstrated online with an in vivo acquisition and evaluated offline with synthetic test data.
resultsNNs were successfully integrated and deployed natively in ICE, performing inline, whole-brain, in vivo NODDI parameter estimation in <10 seconds. DICOM parametric maps were exported from the scanner for further analysis, generally finding that NNMLE estimates were more consistent than NNGT with conventional estimates. Offline evaluation confirms that NNMLE has comparable accuracy and slightly better noise robustness than conventional fitting, whereas NNGT exhibits compromised accuracy at the benefit of higher noise robustness.
conclusionReal-time, inline parameter estimation with the proposed generalisable framework resolves a key practical barrier to clinical uptake of advanced qMRI methods and enables their efficient integration into clinical workflows.
Identifiers
40709300PMC12288656What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.