Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40709300›Full record

ArticleArXiv2025

Real-time, inline quantitative MRI enabled by scanner-integrated machine learning: a proof of principle with NODDI.

Samuel Rot, Iulius Dragonu, Christina Triantafyllou, Matthew Grech-Sollars, Anastasia Papadaki, Laura Mancini, Stephen Wastling, Jennifer Steeden, John Thornton, Tarek Yousry and 4 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Samuel Rot
Iulius Dragonu
Christina Triantafyllou
Matthew Grech-Sollars
Anastasia Papadaki
Laura Mancini
Stephen Wastling
Jennifer Steeden
John Thornton
Tarek Yousry
Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott
David L Thomas
Daniel C Alexander
Hui Zhang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe clinical feasibility and translation of many advanced quantitative MRI (qMRI) techniques are inhibited by their restriction to 'research mode', due to resource-intensive, offline parameter estimation. This work aimed to achieve 'clinical mode' qMRI, by real-time, inline parameter estimation with a trained neural network (NN) fully integrated into a vendor's image reconstruction environment, therefore facilitating and encouraging clinical adoption of advanced qMRI techniques.

methodsThe Siemens Image Calculation Environment (ICE) pipeline was customised to deploy trained NNs for advanced diffusion MRI parameter estimation with Open Neural Network Exchange (ONNX) Runtime. Two fully-connected NNs were trained offline with data synthesised with the neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) model, using either conventionally estimated (NNMLE) or ground truth (NNGT) parameters as training labels. The strategy was demonstrated online with an in vivo acquisition and evaluated offline with synthetic test data.

resultsNNs were successfully integrated and deployed natively in ICE, performing inline, whole-brain, in vivo NODDI parameter estimation in <10 seconds. DICOM parametric maps were exported from the scanner for further analysis, generally finding that NNMLE estimates were more consistent than NNGT with conventional estimates. Offline evaluation confirms that NNMLE has comparable accuracy and slightly better noise robustness than conventional fitting, whereas NNGT exhibits compromised accuracy at the benefit of higher noise robustness.

conclusionReal-time, inline parameter estimation with the proposed generalisable framework resolves a key practical barrier to clinical uptake of advanced qMRI methods and enables their efficient integration into clinical workflows.

Identifiers

PMID40709300
PMCPMC12288656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.