ArticleResearch square2025
Association Between Sleep and Functional Outcome in Critically Ill Patients.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Examine the association between sleep and clinical outcome in patients with acute brain injury and critical illness. Methods: Retrospective analysis of critically ill patients who underwent continuous electroencephalography monitoring in an academic medical center from 2018-2020. Patients admitted with primary neurologic, medical, and surgical conditions were included. Clinical outcome was determined by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS < 3 represented favorable outcome). Statistical modeling of outcome included predictor variables controlling for anesthetic concentration, diagnosis, and sex. Results: 262 patients were included of which 57% were male with a mean age of 58 years (range 18-91). Twenty-one percent of the total population achieved sleep (56/262). Of those achieving any sleep, 43% had good outcomes compared to only 26% who did not (χ Conclusions: Neurocritical patients slept more often, and obtaining any sleep was associated with better functional outcome when controlling disease severity. Further studies are needed to determine whether sleep augmentation and anesthetic use in critically ill patients impact functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.