ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Acute and long-term procedural outcomes, arrhythmia recurrence and mortality after supraventricular arrhythmia ablation: a comparative study of fluoroscopy and zero-fluoroscopy guided techniques.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Zero- or minimal-fluoroscopy vs conventional fluoroscopy in catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardias: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Heart rhythm O2 · 2026Article
- CHAFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Zero-fluoroscopy catheter ablation for arrhythmias in pregnancy: validation of a standardized approach with 5-year follow-up.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Safety and effectiveness of zero fluoroscopy procedures using a novel dual-energy ablation catheter.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Zero-fluoroscopy (ZF) catheter ablation eliminates radiation exposure via use of 3-dimensional electroanatomical mapping. We aimed to assess safety and efficacy of ZF catheter ablation in the treatment of supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs), examine learning-curve characteristics and to evaluate long-term results and mortality. Methods: We analysed clinical characteristics, procedural and follow-up data of 605 consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation for SVT (atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia, Results: Acute procedural success rate exceeded 98% across all arrhythmia groups for both ZF and F techniques (ZF: 99%, F: 100%, Conclusion: Catheter ablation of SVTs using zero-fluoroscopy approach have similar acute success, complication and mortality rate as conventional fluoroscopic interventions. However, we detected significantly higher long-term arrhythmia recurrence after ZF ablation of atrial flutter, meriting further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.