ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction in complex ventral hernia patients: a single institution based prospective study.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical Complexity and Postoperative Outcomes in Recurrent Versus Primary Incisional Hernias Following Elective Retromuscular Repair: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Unsupervised Clinical Phenotyping Identifies Distinct Risk Profiles in Incisional Hernia Repair.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Determinants of Early Quality-of-Life Improvement After Open Abdominal Wall Eventration Repair: A Large Single-Center Cohort Study Using the EuraHS-QoL Score.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Time distribution and intraoperative workflow in complex midline incisional hernia repair.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Observational
- Anterior component separation for complex ventral hernias: outcomes of a tailored reconstruction strategy.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Complex ventral hernias, especially in patients with prior surgeries, large defects, or comorbidities, are associated with high rates of recurrence and complications such as infection, pain, and loss of abdominal domain. This study aims to contribute to developing standardised management strategies. Methods: A prospective study was conducted at BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences over two years, involving 38 patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction for complex ventral hernias. Preoperative assessment included NCCT and selective use of botulinum toxin for optimisation. Surgical approaches were individualised. Data on demographics, hernia characteristics, surgical technique, operative time, complications, hospital stay, recurrence, and chronic pain were collected and analysed. Results: Of 88 ventral hernia cases, 44 were complex; 38 underwent repair. Most were incisional hernias located at M2-M5, with a mean defect size of 7.1 ± 2.9 cm. Mean operative time was 154.8 ± 51.6 minutes. Complications included seroma (15.6%), SSI (15.6%), hematoma (5.3%), and enterotomy (5.3%). Average hospital stay was 2.8 ± 1.2 days; activity resumed in 7.5 ± 2.9 days. At 2-year follow-up, recurrence was seen in 5.2%. Conclusion: Tailored individualised planning is crucial in complex abdominal reconstruction due to patient and defect variability, making standard techniques impractical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.