Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40709047›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2025

Effects of traditional Chinese exercise on lung function and mental health in patients with COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shuning Liu, Debin Xu

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shuning LiuSchool of Marxism, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China.
Debin XuSchool of Marxism, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Despite their widespread use in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pharmacological treatments often demonstrate limited efficacy in alleviating symptoms such as dyspnea and psychological pressure. These limitations highlight the need for complementary nonpharmacological interventions. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of traditional Chinese exercise (TCE) in improving lung function and mental health among patients with COPD. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search across several databases: CNKI (1979-2024), Wanfang (1998-2024), PubMed (1966-2024), the Cochrane Library (1999-2024), and Web of Science (1961-2024), up to September 2024, to gather all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studies that evaluated the effects of TCE as the primary intervention for patients with COPD. The results were analyzed and presented using Review Manager 5.4 software, ensuring a systematic approach to data interpretation and visualization. Results: 67 studies were included and encompassing 5,475 patients. The meta-analysis demonstrated that TCE significantly improved various outcomes in COPD patients, including FEV1 [MD = 0.28, 95% CI (0.23, 0.33), Conclusion: TCE significantly improved lung function and alleviated anxiety and depression in COPD patients. This study not only highlights the value of TCE as a nonpharmacological intervention but also offers new directions for psychological management, warranting broader implementation. Systematic review registration: CRD42024586079, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024586079.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyMedicine, Chinese TraditionalMental HealthPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveHumansRespiratory Function TestsCOPDlung functionmental healthsystematic reviewtraditional Chinese exercise

Identifiers

PMID40709047
PMCPMC12286970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.