ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Developing an interpretable machine learning predictive model of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by serum PFAS concentration.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between serum perfluoroalkyl substances and COPD risk: population evidence and in vitro validation.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Epigenetic vulnerability in endocrine disruption: bridging mechanisms, models, and environmental inequities.Clinical epigenetics · 2026Review
- An Exploration of Machine Learning Methods in Human Biomonitoring.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with limited early detection strategies. While previous studies have examined the relationship between per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and COPD, limited research has applied interpretable machine learning (ML) techniques to this association. Methods: We investigated the association between PFAS exposure and COPD risk in 4,450 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) participants from 2013 to 2018. After excluding missing covariates and extreme PFAS values and applying K-nearest neighbors (KNN) imputation, nine ML models, including CatBoost, were built and evaluated using metrics like accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. The best-performing model was further analyzed using partial dependence plots (PDP) and SHapley additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis. To enhance clinical applicability, the final model was deployed as a publicly accessible web-based risk calculator. Results: CatBoost emerged as the best model, achieving an accuracy of 84%, AUC of 0.89, sensitivity of 81%, and specificity of 84%. PDP revealed that higher perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluoroundecanoic acid (PFUA) levels were associated with reduced COPD risk, whereas perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and 2-(N-Methyl-perfluorooctane sulfonamido) acetic acid (MPAH) showed positive associations with COPD. perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDE), and perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS) demonstrated mixed or non-linear effects. SHAP analysis provided insights into individual predictions and overall variable contributions, clarifying the complex PFAS-COPD relationship. The deployed web-based calculator enables interactive prediction and risk interpretation, supporting potential public health applications. Conclusion: CatBoost identified PFOS and PFUA as protective factors against COPD, while PFOA and MPAH increased risk of COPD. These findings emphasize the need for stricter PFAS regulation and highlight the potential of machine learning in guiding prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.