Observational studyFrontiers in public health2025
Safe engagement in physical activity through pre-exercise risk assessment: an observational study at a single facility over 16 years.
Observational study in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Regular and appropriate physical activity has health benefits; however, to ensure safety, a pre-exercise medical check based on health information is important. In this study, we aimed to clarify the relationship between risk classification by physicians at a health promotion facility in Japan and the occurrence of adverse events during facility use. Methods: We evaluated 3,571 individuals, excluding those with an unknown sex, age, medical assessment of exercise limitations, and facility usage status. Based on the results of the medical checkups conducted by a physician, the participants were divided into an exercise-prohibited group and an exercise-permitted group (exercise-permitted group, subdivided into non-restricted, orthopedic-restricted, internal medical-restricted, and combined-restricted groups). The risk of adverse events was examined. Results: The group in which exercise was prohibited comprised 72 participants, and that in which exercise was permitted comprised 1935, 612, 456, and 496 participants in the non-restricted, orthopedic-restricted, internal medical-restricted, and combined-restricted groups, respectively. Logistic regression analysis was performed on the four subgroups of the exercise-permitted group, and the odds ratios for adverse events adjusted for individual attributes were 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.59-1.84; Conclusion: No significant difference in the odds of adverse events was found regardless of the presence or absence of exercise restrictions. Therefore, despite exercise-related risks, pre-exercise screening can help ensure that exercise is performed as safely as it is by individuals without such risks. However, further discussion is required regarding the necessity of screening for all exercise participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.