Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40709021›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Literature Review of Venous Spasm During Pacemaker Implantation.

Juwayria A Ahmed, Khudheeja A Ahmed, Wasifuddin Syed, Mohammed Habeeb Ahmed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juwayria A AhmedDepartment of Research, Kaaj Healthcare, San Jose, USA.
Khudheeja A AhmedCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Touro University California, Vallejo, USA.
Wasifuddin SyedCollege of Medicine, Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Monroe, USA.
Mohammed Habeeb AhmedDepartment of Cardiology, Kaaj Healthcare, San Jose, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Venous spasm is a rare yet clinically relevant complication during pacemaker implantation that can obstruct venous access and delay procedures. Despite its significance, it is infrequently reported in the literature and not clearly understood, thus lacking a standardized management protocol. This review aimed to synthesize current literature on venous spasm occurring during pacemaker or any other cardiac device implantation, highlight common features, and summarize effective management strategies. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and ScienceDirect through July 2025 identified 17 relevant sources, including five studies and 12 case reports. Axillary and subclavian venous spasm was most frequently reported, particularly in older female patients, and typically diagnosed by contrast venography following unsuccessful guidewire passage. Cephalic venous spasm was also noted infrequently. Management strategies varied, with reported interventions including temporary cessation of manipulation, use of hydrophilic guidewires, administration of intravenous nitroglycerin, adjustment of access puncture site, or contralateral venous access. In some cases, venous spasm was refractory to treatment, requiring procedural modification or abandonment. This review consolidates previously used successful management strategies into a proposed stepwise workflow and underscores the need for further research to improve understanding of venous spasm and to develop standardized treatment guidelines.

Indexed as

axillary veincephalic veinpacemakersubclavian veinvenous spasm

Identifiers

PMID40709021
PMCPMC12289315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.