ReviewCureus2025
Literature Review of Venous Spasm During Pacemaker Implantation.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venous spasm is a rare yet clinically relevant complication during pacemaker implantation that can obstruct venous access and delay procedures. Despite its significance, it is infrequently reported in the literature and not clearly understood, thus lacking a standardized management protocol. This review aimed to synthesize current literature on venous spasm occurring during pacemaker or any other cardiac device implantation, highlight common features, and summarize effective management strategies. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and ScienceDirect through July 2025 identified 17 relevant sources, including five studies and 12 case reports. Axillary and subclavian venous spasm was most frequently reported, particularly in older female patients, and typically diagnosed by contrast venography following unsuccessful guidewire passage. Cephalic venous spasm was also noted infrequently. Management strategies varied, with reported interventions including temporary cessation of manipulation, use of hydrophilic guidewires, administration of intravenous nitroglycerin, adjustment of access puncture site, or contralateral venous access. In some cases, venous spasm was refractory to treatment, requiring procedural modification or abandonment. This review consolidates previously used successful management strategies into a proposed stepwise workflow and underscores the need for further research to improve understanding of venous spasm and to develop standardized treatment guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.