Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40709018›Full record

ArticleHealth open research2023

Introducing the Tele-OCS: Preliminary evidence of validity for a remotely administered version of The Oxford Cognitive Screen.

Sam S Webb, Chloe Carrick, Andrea Kusec, Nele Demeyere

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sam S Webb *Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 9DU, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0029-4665
Chloe Carrick *Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX2 6GG, UK.
Andrea KusecExperimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX2 6GG, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0128-4677
Nele DemeyereExperimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX2 6GG, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0416-5147

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Remote cognitive assessments are increasingly used with the rising popularity of teleneuropsychology. Here, we evaluated the performance of the remotely administered Oxford Cognitive Screen (Tele-OCS) compared to in-person administration in adult stroke survivors. Methods: 40 stroke survivors ( Results: We found that the proportion of OCS subtasks impaired did not differ across modalities ( Conclusions: The Tele-OCS classified cognitive impairments in a comparable way to the in-person version. The validation of the Tele-OCS allows for remote assessment to increase accessibility and pragmatically aid in addressing the clinical need for stroke-specific cognitive screening in a wider population.

Indexed as

cognitive assessmentcognitive screeningremote assessmentteleneuropsychology

Identifiers

PMID40709018
PMCPMC12287908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.