ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Patterns of relapse in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma after convection-enhanced delivery of
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01502917 (A Phase I Study of Convection-Enhanced Delivery of 124I-Omburtamab for Patients With Non-Progressive Diffuse Pontine Gliomas Previously Treated With External Beam Radiation Therapy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase I Study of Convection-Enhanced Delivery of 124I-Omburtamab for Patients With Non-Progressive Diffuse Pontine Gliomas Previously Treated With External Beam Radiation Therapy
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) carries a high mortality rate and lacks effective treatment options with a median overall survival (OS) of 8-12 months. Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) has demonstrated safety in phase I trials, but efficacy is indeterminate. Evaluating anatomic patterns of relapse may aid in determining therapeutic efficacy of local CED drug delivery strategies. Methods: Sixty-three children with DIPG were retrospectively reviewed for first radiographic progression. All patients were treated using conventional external beam radiation (EBRT) and 31 were treated with CED of radiolabeled 124-iodine-omburtamab (NCT01502917). Anatomic patterns of initial progression were coded by independent neuroradiologists. OS and cumulative incidence of progression at each anatomic site were assessed in a competing risk analysis with death as a competing variable and were stratified based on CED treatment. Results: Median OS was 14.67 months for the cohort. Patients receiving CED demonstrated higher rates of progression in general, when considering progression at all anatomical sites (HR 1.79, Conclusions: Anatomically defined patterns of relapse provide evidence for locoregional control in children with DIPG treated with radioimmunotherapy administered by CED. Future CED or local surgical therapy trials can benefit from including detailed patterns of relapse as a prospective outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.