ArticleArchives of plastic surgery2025
Assessment of Capsular Contracture Based on Morphological Change of Breast Implant Using Computed Tomography.
Article in Archives of plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Capsular Contracture in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Comprehensive Narrative Review of Pathophysiology, Risk Factors, and Contemporary Controversies.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Capsular contracture is a common complication following implant-based breast reconstruction. Current assessment methods, primarily relying on the subjective Baker grading system, lack objectivity and quantitative data, which hinders large-scale studies and the development of treatment guidelines. To solve these problems, we conducted a study using computed tomography (CT) scans to quantitatively evaluate morphological changes in breast implants associated with capsular contracture. Methods: We enrolled 94 patients who underwent breast reconstruction using implants and underwent periodic chest CT scans. We categorized them into two groups: Baker grade I or II ( Results: In the Baker grade III or IV groups, it was confirmed that the ratio of projection to base increased after capsular contracture compared with before contracture. On the other hand, there was no significant change in the ratio of projection to base in the Baker grade I or II groups. Conclusion: This study highlights the potential of CT scans as a reproducible method for evaluating capsular contracture. The ratio of projection to base could serve as a new quantitative index alongside the Baker grades for clinical assessment, treatment planning, and research on capsular contracture. When comparing the ratio of projection to base before and after capsular contracture, if the ratio of projection to base increases by more than 1.233 times, it can be considered Baker grade III or IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.