ReviewAsiaIntervention2025
Mitral annular calcification in interventional cardiology: address all fears.
Review in AsiaIntervention, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Navigation of the Clinical Implications, Interventional Challenges, and Complexities of the Circumflex Coronary Artery: A Comprehensive Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mitral annular calcification (MAC) is a particularly challenging pathological condition that can prove difficult to address. It consists of calcium depositions in the mitral valve ring, secondary to chronic inflammation and complex molecular pathogenetic mechanisms of injury and cellular response. MAC has been associated with worse survival in patients with valvulopathies compared to individuals without MAC, as well as with an enhanced risk for cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. MAC also complicates interventions in the aortic and mitral valves, with several reports showcasing suboptimal results after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). For mitral interventions, it is currently being evaluated whether transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) or transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TVMR) would best suit these patients, in the presence of severe mitral regurgitation (MR), with both procedures showing benefit in early study results. However, the limitations of each procedure for certain phenotypes and anatomies necessitate more extensive research, aiming to identify the most suitable candidates for each intervention. The purpose of this review is, thus, to present a summary of the factors that affect MAC, explore available diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, and provide a framework to anticipate and overcome the potential challenges that may arise during MAC-associated mitral valve disease treatment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.