ArticleAsiaIntervention2025
Clinical safety and performance of a biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent in an all-comers population: results from the S-FLEX Russia registry.
Article in AsiaIntervention, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ultrathin-strut stents - towards zero stent-related events?AsiaIntervention · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The safety and clinical performance of the Supraflex Cruz sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) have not been explored within a Russian population until now. Aims: The S-FLEX Russia registry was designed to evaluate the clinical safety and performance of the Supraflex Cruz SES in a real-world, all-comers Russian population undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: This was a prospective, multicentre, single-arm, observational registry that included 522 patients who underwent PCI with the Supraflex Cruz SES between August 2021 and February 2022, at five hospitals in Russia. Subgroups prespecified for data analysis included patients with diabetes mellitus, bifurcation lesions, type B2/C lesions and at least one long lesion (>20 mm). The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI) and clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (CD-TLR) at 12-month follow-up. Results: The mean age of the patient population was 64.26±9.46 years. Device and procedural success were 99.4% and 98.9%, respectively. At 12 months, TLF was observed in 16 (3.1%) patients, comprising 8 (1.5%) cardiac deaths, 6 (1.1%) TVMI, and 2 (0.4%) CD-TLR. Only 1 (0.2%) instance of definite stent thrombosis was observed at 12-month follow-up. In the high-risk subgroups, TLF at 12 months was 5.6% in patients with diabetes, 8.5% in bifurcation lesions, 2.8% in complex B2/C lesions, and 1.9% in long lesions (>20 mm). Conclusions: Low rates of TLF and stent thrombosis at 12-month follow-up demonstrate the excellent safety and clinical performance of the Supraflex Cruz SES in a real-world, all-comers Russian population, including prespecified high-risk subgroups.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.