ReviewBioengineering & translational medicine2025
In vivo evaluation of decellularized skeletal muscle matrices for skeletal muscle repair: A systematic review.
Review in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- TGFβ1-loaded extracellular matrix hydrogels promote skeletal muscle stem cell regeneration via m6A-mediated integrin-ERK signaling.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Neuromuscular Mechanisms and Oxidative Stress in Skeletal Muscle Atrophy: Emerging Stem Cell and Gene-Based Therapeutic Strategies.Muscles (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Conductive MXene/adECM hydrogel promotes skeletal muscle regeneration and innervation through CaJournal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Regarding: In Vivo Evaluation of Decellularised Skeletal Muscle Matrices for Skeletal Muscle Repair: A Systematic Review.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- In vivo evaluation of decellularized skeletal muscle matrices for skeletal muscle repair: A systematic review.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Volumetric muscle loss is the significant loss of skeletal muscle volume beyond the innate regenerative capacity, resulting in functional impairment. The current standard of care combines muscle autografting with physical therapy but is often insufficient to reach full recovery. Decellularized skeletal muscle (DSM) provides an interesting alternative to repair volumetric muscle loss. The native structure and composition of the extracellular matrix in these acellular implants provide a blueprint for muscle regeneration. Moreover, DSM can be combined with cells to facilitate the regeneration of the skeletal muscle defect. This systematic review provides a complete and thorough overview of the state-of-the-art applications and efficacy of DSM matrices in skeletal muscle repair in vivo, selected according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Technical information on the different methods to create DSM implants and the implantation studies is provided. Moreover, details on the evaluation of the structural and functional regeneration of the muscle defect after implantation of the DSM are described. Results reveal a large heterogeneity in the analysis of regeneration upon DSM implantation. This heterogeneity makes it difficult to fully assess the efficiency of DSM to regenerate skeletal muscle, hampering further translation of this technique. Therefore, we suggest a multi-level evaluation method to assess (i) muscle regeneration, (ii) vascularization, (iii) innervation of the regenerated muscle, and (iv) functional regeneration in a quantitative way.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.