Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40708976›Full record

ReviewBioengineering & translational medicine2025

In vivo evaluation of decellularized skeletal muscle matrices for skeletal muscle repair: A systematic review.

Ina Hennion, Charlot Philips, Chong Jiang, Nele Van De Winkel, Laurens J Ceulemans, Lieven Thorrez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ina HennionTissue Engineering Lab, Department of Development and Regeneration KU Leuven campus Kulak Kortrijk Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0360-5385
Charlot PhilipsTissue Engineering Lab, Department of Development and Regeneration KU Leuven campus Kulak Kortrijk Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6834-0763
Chong JiangTissue Engineering Lab, Department of Development and Regeneration KU Leuven campus Kulak Kortrijk Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4216-4369
Nele Van De WinkelDepartment of Abdominal Surgery University Hospitals Leuven Leuven Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4862-478X
Laurens J CeulemansDepartment of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, Lab of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE) KU Leuven Leuven Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4261-7100
Lieven ThorrezTissue Engineering Lab, Department of Development and Regeneration KU Leuven campus Kulak Kortrijk Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5896-6823

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Volumetric muscle loss is the significant loss of skeletal muscle volume beyond the innate regenerative capacity, resulting in functional impairment. The current standard of care combines muscle autografting with physical therapy but is often insufficient to reach full recovery. Decellularized skeletal muscle (DSM) provides an interesting alternative to repair volumetric muscle loss. The native structure and composition of the extracellular matrix in these acellular implants provide a blueprint for muscle regeneration. Moreover, DSM can be combined with cells to facilitate the regeneration of the skeletal muscle defect. This systematic review provides a complete and thorough overview of the state-of-the-art applications and efficacy of DSM matrices in skeletal muscle repair in vivo, selected according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Technical information on the different methods to create DSM implants and the implantation studies is provided. Moreover, details on the evaluation of the structural and functional regeneration of the muscle defect after implantation of the DSM are described. Results reveal a large heterogeneity in the analysis of regeneration upon DSM implantation. This heterogeneity makes it difficult to fully assess the efficiency of DSM to regenerate skeletal muscle, hampering further translation of this technique. Therefore, we suggest a multi-level evaluation method to assess (i) muscle regeneration, (ii) vascularization, (iii) innervation of the regenerated muscle, and (iv) functional regeneration in a quantitative way.

Indexed as

acellular matrixdecellularizationpreclinical modelsrecellularizationskeletal muscle regenerationtissue engineeringvolumetric muscle loss

Identifiers

PMID40708976
PMCPMC12284429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.