Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40708963›Full record

ArticleThe Analysis of verbal behavior2025

The Effects of Reinforcing Tacting on the Recall of Children with Autism.

Stephanie Keesey-Phelan, Judah B Axe, Philip N Chase

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Analysis of verbal behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephanie Keesey-PhelanDepartment of Behavior Analysis, Simmons University, 300 The Fenway, Boston, MA 02115 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4096-451X
Judah B AxeDepartment of Behavior Analysis, Simmons University, 300 The Fenway, Boston, MA 02115 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6182-2145
Philip N ChaseDepartment of Behavior Analysis, Simmons University, 300 The Fenway, Boston, MA 02115 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attending to and tacting stimuli in a situation may facilitate recall of that situation. To evaluate this, we showed varied slide decks of 25 black-and-white stick figures engaged in actions to four adolescents and one child with autism. Ten minutes later, we asked them to name the pictures they remembered. Using a multielement design, we compared three conditions in the picture viewing context wherein we (a) instructed the participant to view the pictures quietly, (b) prompted and reinforced tacts of the pictures, or (c) required the participant to repeat a series of letters and numbers (i.e., a blocking procedure). For four of the participants, recall was highest in the condition in which we prompted and reinforced tacts of the pictures. These data provide preliminary support for the hypothesis that prompting and reinforcing tacting stimuli enhances recall with respect to those stimuli, though several limitations and directions for future research are discussed.

Indexed as

AttendingAutismMemoryRecallTacting

Identifiers

PMID40708963
PMCPMC12283510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.