ReviewFrontiers in neurology2025
Multisensory integration, brain plasticity and optogenetics in visual rehabilitation.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and mirror therapy for upper limb rehabilitation in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Pooled it
- Engram cell vulnerability in neurodegeneration: from mechanistic insights to therapeutic horizons.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- Environmental enrichment as a mitochondria-targeting systems strategy across neurodegenerative diseases and retinal dystrophies.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- A Personal Scientific Journey in Ophthalmology: Twenty-Five Years of Translating Research into Novel Therapies.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Investigating the impairment-performance relationship during competition in elite blind and partially sighted football.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multisensory integration enables the brain to integrate information from different sensory modalities while enhancing perception. This principle relies on phenomena of neuroplasticity (i.e., the ability of neuronal networks in the brain to adapt to changing environmental conditions) and is crucial for visual rehabilitation, particularly in hemianopia and retinal degeneration. Here we review emerging experimental approaches and their translational potential for vision recovery in visually impaired patients. Rehabilitation strategies incorporating multisensory training, optogenetics, and pharmacological interventions have demonstrated to be instrumental in restoring visual function by leveraging plasticity of inputs from different sensory modalities. Emerging technologies such as virtual reality and auditory-visual stimulation further optimize neural reorganization. Future research should focus on refining these interventions to enhance sensory compensation and recovery. Understanding the role of multisensory ganglion cells and retinal circuits may unlock new strategies for improving visual function in visually impaired individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.