ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2025
Targeted decontamination of sequencing data with CLEAN.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbial cell-free DNA for rapid pathogen identification in clinical diagnostics: a proof of concept study.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- Mitigation and detection of putative microbial contaminant reads from long-read metagenomic datasets.Microbial genomics · 2026Article
- Article
- nf-core/detaxizer: a benchmarking study for decontamination from human sequences.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Essential nucleic acid omics: a theoretical foundation for early-stage users.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many biological and medical questions are answered based on the analysis of sequence data. However, we can find contamination, artificial spike-ins, and overrepresented rRNA (ribosomal RNA) sequences in various read collections and assemblies. In particular, spike-ins used as controls, as those known from Illumina or Nanopore data, are often not considered as contaminants and also not appropriately removed during analyses. Additionally, removing human host DNA may be necessary for data protection and ethical considerations to ensure that individuals cannot be identified. We developed CLEAN, a pipeline to remove unwanted sequences from both long- and short-read sequencing techniques. While focusing on Illumina and Nanopore data with their technology-specific control sequences, the pipeline can also be used for host decontamination of metagenomic reads and assemblies, or the removal of rRNA from RNA-Seq data. The results are the purified sequences and sequences identified as contaminated with statistics summarized in a report. The output can be used directly in subsequent analyses, resulting in faster computations and improved results. Although decontamination seems mundane, many contaminants are routinely overlooked, cleaned by steps that are not fully reproducible or difficult to trace. CLEAN facilitates reproducible, platform-independent data analysis in genomics and transcriptomics and is freely available at https://github.com/rki-mf1/clean under a BSD3 license.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.