ArticleJournal of eye movement research2025
eyeNotate: Interactive Annotation of Mobile Eye Tracking Data Based on Few-Shot Image Classification.
Article in Journal of eye movement research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mobile eye tracking is an important tool in psychology and human-centered interaction design for understanding how people process visual scenes and user interfaces. However, analyzing recordings from head-mounted eye trackers, which typically include an egocentric video of the scene and a gaze signal, is a time-consuming and largely manual process. To address this challenge, we develop eyeNotate, a web-based annotation tool that enables semi-automatic data annotation and learns to improve from corrective user feedback. Users can manually map fixation events to areas of interest (AOIs) in a video-editing-style interface (baseline version). Further, our tool can generate fixation-to-AOI mapping suggestions based on a few-shot image classification model (IML-support version). We conduct an expert study with trained annotators (n = 3) to compare the baseline and IML-support versions. We measure the perceived usability, annotations' validity and reliability, and efficiency during a data annotation task. We asked our participants to re-annotate data from a single individual using an existing dataset (n = 48). Further, we conducted a semi-structured interview to understand how participants used the provided IML features and assessed our design decisions. In a post hoc experiment, we investigate the performance of three image classification models in annotating data of the remaining 47 individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.