ArticleJournal of eye movement research2025
Influence of Time Pressure on Successive Visual Searches.
Article in Journal of eye movement research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Time pressure and reward value's influence on visual search performance and behavior: an eye-tracking VR study.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the current eye-tracking experiment, we explored the effects of time pressure on visual search performance and oculomotor behavior. Participants performed two consecutive time-pressured searches for a T-shaped target among L-shaped distractors in two separate displays of fifteen items, with the option to self-interrupt the first search (Search 1) to proceed to the second (Search 2). Our results showed that participants maintained high search accuracy during Search 1 across all conditions, but performance noticeably declined during Search 2 with increasing time pressure. Time pressure also led to decreased numbers of fixations and faster response times overall. When both targets where acquired, fixation durations were longer in Search 2 than in Search 1, while saccade amplitudes were shorter in Search 2. Our findings suggest that time pressure leads to the first target being prioritized when targets possess equal value, emphasizing the challenges of optimizing performance in time-sensitive tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.