Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40708798›Full record

ArticleJournal of eye movement research2025

Improving Reading and Eye Movement Control in Readers with Oculomotor and Visuo-Attentional Deficits.

Stéphanie Ducrot, Bernard Lété, Marie Vernet, Delphine Massendari, Jérémy Danna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eye movement research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stéphanie DucrotAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, LPL, Aix-en-Provence, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4823-8037
Bernard LétéLaboratoire d'Étude des Mécanismes Cognitifs, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5954-9178
Marie VernetAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, LPL, Aix-en-Provence, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1243-8312
Delphine MassendariAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, LPL, Aix-en-Provence, France.
Jérémy DannaCLLE, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France; jeremy.danna@cnrs.fr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3596-880X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The initial saccade of experienced readers tends to land halfway between the beginning and the middle of words, at a position originally referred to as the preferred viewing location (PVL). This study investigated whether a simple physical manipulation-namely, increasing the saliency (brightness or color) of the letter located at the PVL-can positively influence saccadic targeting strategies and optimize reading performance. An eye-movement experiment was conducted with 25 adults and 24 s graders performing a lexical decision task. Results showed that this manipulation had no effect on initial landing positions in proficient readers, who already landed most frequently at the PVL, suggesting that PVL saliency is irrelevant once automatized saccade targeting routines are established. In contrast, the manipulation shifted the peak of the landing site distribution toward the PVL for a cluster of readers with immature saccadic strategies (with low reading-level scores and ILPs close to the beginning of words), but only in the brightness condition, and had a more compelling effect in a cluster with oculomotor instability (with flattened and diffuse landing position curves along with oculomotor and visuo-attentional deficits). These findings suggest that guiding the eyes toward the PVL may offer a novel way to improve reading efficiency, particularly for individuals with oculomotor and visuo-attentional difficulties.

Indexed as

inexperienced readersoculomotor and visuo-attentional deficitspoor readersPVL saliencyreading strategiesremedial toolsaccadic computation

Identifiers

PMID40708798
PMCPMC12286046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.