Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40708790›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Succession of Lichens in Front of Retreating Glaciers in Sweden and Norway.

Josef P Halda, Jan Košnar, Alena Lukešová

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Josef P HaldaFaculty of Science, Department of Biology University of Hradec Králové Hradec Králové Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0264-8535
Jan KošnarNature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic Regional Office East Bohemia Pardubice Czech Republic.
Alena LukešováDepartment of Soil Microbiology and Soil Chemistry Biology Centre CAS České Budějovice Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change is accelerating the melting of glaciers to create new habitats colonized by pioneer organisms. Lichens are adapted to extreme conditions and, together with cyanobacteria and algae, are generally among the first organisms to appear in primary succession. The exact mechanism of lichen community formation and the factors influencing species turnover are still poorly understood. The aim was to determine the time zones of succession of terricolous and saxicolous species after glacier retreat, and to identify common ecological traits among pioneer species, including thallus type. Additionally, lichen species were categorized into time periods based on their colonization rates. Finally, differences among dated plots in the glacier forelands of Midtdalsbreen (Norway) and Storglaciären (Sweden) were compared. Taxon: Lichens. Location: Arctic. A total of 27 plots (135 subplots) were delineated across five successional age classes (9-264 years postglaciation). Lichen abundances and environmental variables (e.g., orientation, substrate composition) were recorded. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) and detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) were used to analyze species composition gradients and the effect of successional age. Monte Carlo permutation tests were performed to determine statistical significance (499 permutations). Lichen species richness increased rapidly in the early succession (15-25 years), but stagnated or slightly declined in older stages (> 100 years), probably due to competitive displacement. Early successional pioneer species included

Indexed as

Arcticbiocrustclimate warmingglacierslichenScandinaviaspecies distribution modelsuccessiontundra

Identifiers

PMID40708790
PMCPMC12286706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.