ArticleFrontiers in health services2025
"
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Multiple job holding (MJH), the phenomenon of working in more than one paid job simultaneously, affects the achievement of universal health coverage. The dearth of research on MJH among dentists, especially in Africa, forms the backdrop to this study. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of key policy actors on MJH among dentists in Nairobi, Kenya. Methods: This qualitative study combined semi-structured interviews with key informants and in-depth interviews with dentists who are engaged in MJH. The key informants were selected purposively from the Kenyan government, the regulator, representative organizations of dentists, and oral health researchers and/or experts in human resources for health. The dentists were selected from the government, the private sector, and faith-based organizations, using snowball sampling. The interviews focused on knowledge and/or experiences of MJH, reasons for, and the consequences of MJH. The interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Thirty interviews were conducted, comprising 20 key informants, and 10 dentists. MJH among dentists is seen as a normative practice, facilitated by a profession characterized by high rewards and few or no adverse consequences from absenteeism. Although additional income is the primary motivation for MJH, low job satisfaction, the lack of continuing professional development, perverse incentives, and a dysfunctional and resource-constrained public health sector exacerbate MJH. The lack of regulation compounds the practice, while a strong private health sector provides opportunities for multiple sources of income, affecting the provision of oral health services negatively in the public sector. Conclusion: MJH among dentists in Nairobi, Kenya is common because of high rewards and few or no adverse consequences from absenteeism. The high reported occurrence of MJH requires a multi-pronged approach that combines individual, system, and structural interventions. Such an approach should also consider the drivers of MJH, and ensure collaboration among policymakers, dentists, and health service managers to develop strategies to mitigate the potential negative consequences of MJH for patients, the health workforce, and oral healthcare delivery in Nairobi.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.