ArticleFood science & nutrition2025
Examining the Relationship Between Dietary Glycemic Load (GL), Glycemic Index (GI), and the Odds of Diminished Ovarian Reserve: A Case-Control Study.
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations between dietary glycemic and insulinemic patterns and eating behavior in adults: a cluster-based analysis.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2026Article
- Examining the Relationship Between Dietary Glycemic Load (GL), Glycemic Index (GI), and the Odds of Diminished Ovarian Reserve: A Case-Control Study.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A decline in both the number and quality of oocytes within the ovaries indicates a reduced ovarian reserve. As lifestyle factors, particularly dietary habits, can influence ovarian reserve, this study aimed to assess the relationship between dietary glycemic load (GL) and glycemic index (GI) and odds of diminished ovarian reserve (DOR). The current case-control study includes 370 women, consisting of 120 women who had DOR and 250 control participants. The two groups were matched based on age and body mass index (BMI). The dietary information was collected using a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) that consisted of 80 items. A multivariable logistic regression approach was used to assess the association of dietary GI and GL scores with the odds of DOR, adjusting for potential confounders. The initial result revealed that there was no significant association between the odds of DOR and the dietary GI and GL when assessed through both crude and adjusted analyses, which accounted for factors such as physical activity and energy intake. However, when adjustments were made for factors such as physical activity, energy intake, fat mass (FM), and BMI, it was observed that women who were in the highest quartile of the dietary GL and GI scores had a 13% (OR 1.13; 95% CI 1.07-2.68,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.