Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40708771›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2025

Fediša Modikologo: breaking the intergenerational cycle of violence against women and children. Theoretical framework and protocol for a prospective cohort study.

Rachel Jewkes, Leane Ramsoomar, Jani Nothling, Samantha Willan, Venice Mbowane, Esnat Chirwa, Shibe Mhlongo, Maureen Phakoe, Desiree Pass, Amanda Zembe and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Rachel JewkesGender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, Gauteng, 0002, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4330-6267
Leane RamsoomarGender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, Gauteng, 0002, South Africa.
Jani NothlingGender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, Gauteng, 0002, South Africa.
Samantha WillanGender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, Gauteng, 0002, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8629-887X
Venice MbowaneGender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, Gauteng, 0002, South Africa.
Esnat ChirwaGender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, Gauteng, 0002, South Africa.
Shibe MhlongoGender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, Gauteng, 0002, South Africa.
Maureen PhakoeGender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, Gauteng, 0002, South Africa.
Desiree PassGender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, Gauteng, 0002, South Africa.
Amanda ZembeGender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, Gauteng, 0002, South Africa.
Louis SibiyaBiostatistics Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, Gauteng, 0002, South Africa.
Ishen SeocharanBiostatistics Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, Gauteng, 0002, South Africa.
Charntel PaileGender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, Gauteng, 0002, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2927-6621
Laura WashingtonProject Empower, Diakonia Centre, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Nataly WoollettSchool of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.
Bianca DekelGender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, Gauteng, 0002, South Africa.
Nwabisa Jama-ShaiGender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, Gauteng, 0002, South Africa.
Mercilene MachisaGender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, Gauteng, 0002, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7275-1100
Pinky MahlanguGender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, Gauteng, 0002, South Africa.
Boitumelo SeepamoreSchool of Social Applied Human Sciences (Social Work), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8083-2613
Nicola ChristofidesSchool of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.
Tracy GlassBurden of Disease Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Darshini GovindasamyHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Durban, KwaZulul-Natal, South Africa.
Stanley CarriesHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Durban, KwaZulul-Natal, South Africa.
Asiphe KeteloGender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, Gauteng, 0002, South Africa.
Naeemah AbrahamsGender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, Gauteng, 0002, South Africa.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In South Africa, after two decades of national femicide surveillance, we know comparatively little about what places women who experience intimate partner violence (IPV) at risk of intimate partner femicide. Further we have not mapped the multi-generational health, social and economic impact of severe IPV on women subjected to it, and their children, nor the consequences of help-seeking, nor described what helps, STET recovery trajectories. This study aims to deepen understanding of risk factors for femicide and the health, social and economic impacts of severe IPV on women and their families, including understanding risk and resilience to intergenerational cycling of violence. It further aims to describe how statutory and community measures operate to enable recovery and safety. Following pilot research, we developed a prospective questionnaire-based cohort study with three components, and plan for nested qualitative research. The primary cohort will enrol 12,000 women experiencing severe IPV, recruited using non-probabilistic methods (mostly referral from services and community members, and chain-recruitment). Following a baseline interview, participants will complete annual on-line surveys to track key outcomes for five years. The main questionnaire will measure exposure to range of different forms of IPV in the past year, lifetime trauma exposure history, childhood background, health, social and economic circumstances and help-seeking practices. A sub-cohort of the women (a 20% sub-sample), will be followed more intensively over 3 years. Among these, the children aged 6 years and over, of consenting mothers, will also be followed for three years. Deaths in the cohorts will be tracked through the National Population Register through participants' national identity numbers. Mixed-methods verbal autopsies will be conducted with friends or family members of deceased participants. Results will guide femicide prevention nationally, and will build understanding of what is needed to prevent intergenerational cycling of violence and enable recovery of exposed women and children.

Indexed as

Violence against women; violence against children; femicide; cohort; mental health; recovery; resilience; risk factors;

Identifiers

PMID40708771
PMCPMC12287687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.