ArticleWorld journal of emergency medicine2025
Effect of bag valve ventilation versus mechanical ventilation after endotracheal intubation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on outcomes following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a propensity score analysis.
Article in World journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Changes in knowledge and attitude after community-based first-aid training: a prospective study with a 12-month follow-up.World journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Intubation exposure associated with first-pass success - understanding practitioner-related characteristics in South African EMS.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of mechanical ventilator (MV) utilizaton during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patient clinical outcomes in the emergency department.
methodsThis single-centered, retrospective, case-control study analyzed electronic medical records. Patients aged >18 years with non-traumatic OHCA who were treated at an emergency medical center between January 2019 and December 2023 were included. These patients were accessed according to the ventilatory method used: MV ventilation (volume control, tidal volume 6-8 mL/kg, frequency 10 beat per minute, inspiratory time 1 s) and manual resuscitator bag valve (BV) ventilation. The primary outcome was the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). After 1:1 propensity score matching, the clinical outcomes were analyzed.
resultsA total of 649 patients were enrolled in this study. Before matching, the clinical outcomes and pneumothorax incidence did not differ between the MV and BV groups. After 1:1 matching between the two groups using propensity scores, 522 patients (261 MV and 261 BV) were analyzed. Propensity score matching yielded an adequate balance (standardized mean difference <0.10) for all covariates. The estimated odds ratio (
conclusionIn patients with OHCA admitted to the emergency department, MV ventilation during CPR showed clinical outcomes similar to those of BV ventilation in most measures. However, survival at hospital discharge was significantly higher in the MV group, suggesting potential benefits of MV use in selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.