Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40708707›Full record

ArticleEJHaem2025

Multicenter Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial of the Romiplostim Biosimilar.

Anait L Melikyan, Ekaterina A Protsenko, Galina N Salogub, Bulat A Bakirov, Igor L Davydkin, Vladislav V Kovalik, Mariia L Gefen, Yuliia D Matvienko, Valeria B Saparova, Alexander L Khokhlov and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJHaem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06497036 (Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study of Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of GP40141), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06497036 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study of Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of GP40141 (GEROPHARM, Russia) Compared With Nplate® (Amgen, the Netherlands) in Patients With Persistent or Early Immune Thrombocytopenia

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeropharmRan2023 to 2028Enrolled160ConditionsDrug Effect, Safety Issues, ImmunogenicityArmsGP404141, Nplate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anait L MelikyanNational Research Center for Hematology Moscow Russian Federation.
Ekaterina A ProtsenkoR&D Center GEROPHARM St Petersburg Russian Federation.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4341-2884
Galina N SalogubAlmazov National Medical Research Centre Ministry of Health of Russia St Petersburg Russian Federation.
Bulat A BakirovFederal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "Bashkir State Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation," Ufa Russian Federation.
Igor L DavydkinFederal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "Samara State Medical University," Samara Russian Federation.
Vladislav V KovalikR&D Center GEROPHARM St Petersburg Russian Federation.
Mariia L GefenR&D Center GEROPHARM St Petersburg Russian Federation.
Yuliia D MatvienkoR&D Center GEROPHARM St Petersburg Russian Federation.
Valeria B SaparovaR&D Center GEROPHARM St Petersburg Russian Federation.
Alexander L KhokhlovFederal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "Yaroslavl State Medical University" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation Yaroslavl Russian Federation.
Igor E MakarenkoR&D Center GEROPHARM St Petersburg Russian Federation.
Roman V DraiR&D Center GEROPHARM St Petersburg Russian Federation.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This was a randomized multicenter single-blinded active-controlled equivalence Phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of the biosimilar of romiplostim (GP40141) compared to the reference drug Nplate in patients with persistent or chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Methods: The study included 136 adult patients randomized 1:1 to receive either the biosimilar or reference drug for 26 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a platelet response (≥ 50 × 10 Results: The proportion of patients with platelet response after 10 weeks of therapy was 78% in the test group and 85% in the comparison group. The absolute difference in proportion between groups was -0.06 (95% CI [-0.196, 0.068] and it falls within the equivalence limits [-0.225, 0.225]). The study demonstrated equivalence in the primary endpoint, with no significant differences between the biosimilar and reference drug groups in durable responses rate, bleeding events, or safety profiles. Conclusions: The results support the biosimilar romiplostim as an equivalent and comparable treatment option to the reference drug for patients with persistent or chronic ITP. Trial Registration: NCT06497036.

Indexed as

biosimilarprimary immune thrombocytopeniaromiplostimTPO‐RA

Identifiers

PMID40708707
PMCPMC12288612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.