SynthesisFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Bibliometric and visualization analysis of hydrogel research in spinal cord injury: comparative study of Chinese and English literature.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Over the past decade, the fields of hydrogel and spinal cord injury (SCI) research have witnessed rapid development. To explore disparities between China and global trends in hydrogel research, this study systematically conducted qualitative and quantitative analyses of related publications, summarizing current research foci and future directions. This provides critical guidance for researchers to delve deeper into hydrogel applications. Methods: A total of 866 records in the hydrogel and SCI domains were collected from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) between 2014 and 2024. CiteSpace, VOSviewer, SCImago, and the R package "bibliometrix" were utilized to analyze regional distributions, institutional collaborations, journal impacts, author productivity, and keyword trends. Results: Annual publications in hydrogel and SCI research exhibited consistent growth. China ( Conclusion: By integrating WoSCC and CNKI data, this study comprehensively elucidates geographical disparities in research priorities between China and the global scientific community regarding hydrogel-mediated SCI repair, thereby proposing an evidence-based framework for international collaborative innovation. These insights offer valuable references to guide future hydrogel research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.