Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40708679›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of cognitive disorders in Parkinson's disease: Consensus recommendations from a modified Delphi process.

Dana Pourzinal, Deborah Brooks, Deepa Sriram, Leander K Mitchell, Nancy A Pachana, Kirstine Shrubsole, Brian Wood, John D O'Sullivan, Rodney Marsh, Alexander Lehn and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. What can we do to enhance cognitive care in Parkinson's disease?Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Dana PourzinalUQ Centre for Clinical Research The University of Queensland Herston Queensland Australia.
Deborah BrooksUQ Centre for Clinical Research The University of Queensland Herston Queensland Australia.
Deepa SriramUQ Centre for Clinical Research The University of Queensland Herston Queensland Australia.
Leander K MitchellSchool of Psychology The University of Queensland Saint Lucia Queensland Australia.
Nancy A PachanaSchool of Psychology The University of Queensland Saint Lucia Queensland Australia.
Kirstine ShrubsoleQueensland Aphasia Research Centre The University of Queensland Herston Queensland Australia.
Brian WoodMetro South Movement Disorders Service Redland Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia.
John D O'SullivanUQ Centre for Clinical Research The University of Queensland Herston Queensland Australia.
Rodney MarshUQ Centre for Clinical Research The University of Queensland Herston Queensland Australia.
Alexander LehnDepartment of Neurology Princess Alexandra Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia.
Jacki LiddleSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences The University of Queensland Saint Lucia Queensland Australia.
Edwin C K TanSchool of Pharmacy Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia.
W Kim HalfordSchool of Psychology The University of Queensland Saint Lucia Queensland Australia.
Neil PageUQ Centre for Clinical Research The University of Queensland Herston Queensland Australia.
Nadeeka N DissanayakaUQ Centre for Clinical Research The University of Queensland Herston Queensland Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0164-3337

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVariations in clinical management of cognitive disorders in Parkinson's disease (PD) can delay diagnosis, treatment, and care. To harmonize clinical practice, we aimed to gain consensus on best practice recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of cognitive disorders in PD.

methodFifty-eight evidence-based recommendations were presented to an expert panel (

resultsFifty-one evidence-based and expert-endorsed recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of cognitive disorders in PD were produced. DISCUSSION: The recommendations serve as a foundational framework to guide clinical practice for cognitive disorders in PD and improve the provision of care. Highlights: Recommendations for cognitive disorders in Parkinson's disease were developed.Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of cognitive disorders were explored.A modified Delphi approach was used.A panel of 29 Australian clinician and/or research experts provided input.Fifty-one evidence-based and expert-backed recommendations were developed.

Indexed as

cognitive impairmentdementiaguidelinesParkinson's disease

Identifiers

PMID40708679
PMCPMC12287750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.