ArticleFrontiers in big data2025
Optimizing public health management with predictive analytics: leveraging the power of random forest.
Article in Frontiers in big data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictive estimation of economic outcome changes associated with legal frameworks and public health policy conditions.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Community health outcomes significantly impact older populations' wellbeing and quality of life. Traditional analytical methods often struggle to accurately predict health risks at the community level due to their inability to capture complex, non-linear relationships among various health determinants. This study employs a Random Forest Algorithm (RFA) to address this limitation and enhance the predictive modeling of community health outcomes. By leveraging ensemble learning techniques and multi-factor analysis, this study aims to identify and quantify the relative contributions of key health indicators to risk assessment. The study begins with comprehensive data collection from diverse health sources, followed by a systematic preprocessing stage, which includes resolving missing values, normalizing variables, and encoding categorical features. Using bootstrap sampling, multiple decision trees were trained on random subsets of health data, ensuring variability in the model learning. The trees grow to full depth and aggregate their predictions to enhance the accuracy. An out-of-bag (OOB) error estimation was applied to refine the model and provide unbiased performance assessments, ensuring robust generalization to unseen data. The proposed model effectively analyzes key health indicators, ranking the feature importance to determine the most influential predictors of health risks. Results indicate that RFA achieves an accuracy rate of 92%, outperforming conventional prediction methods in terms of precision and recall. These findings underscore the efficacy of Random Forest in identifying critical health risk factors, paving the way for targeted and data-driven public health management strategies and interventions tailored to older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.