ArticleRoyal Society open science2025
The effect of vection on the use of optic flow cues.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- How the characteristics of a virtual environment affects the perception of travel distance through it.PloS one · 2026Article
- The effect of vection on the use of optic flow cues.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When we move objects move past us in a relative pattern of motion referred to as optic flow. Modulations in optic flow can impact both our perception of self-motion (e.g. perceived distance travelled) and our feeling of self-motion, referred to as vection (e.g. speed of self-motion). The perception and feeling of self-motion have so far been studied independently, leaving open whether and how the two relate to each other. In the current study, stationary participants performed a self-motion task in virtual reality where they moved to previously indicated distances using constant velocity optic flow. The perception of self-motion was measured as the ratio between the distance to travel and the distance travelled, where stopping sooner indicates that the optic flow cues were more effective in creating the perception of self-motion. Vection experience was measured via a questionnaire. When participants felt vection, there was a correlation between stopping distance (reflecting the perception of self-motion) and the felt speed of vection (reflecting the feeling of self-motion), i.e. the faster participants felt they were moving the sooner they stopped. These results show that the perception and feeling of self-motion are linked and that treating the two concepts independently can lead to misinterpretations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.