ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Lyme Disease Biobank: 10 years of 3 month follow-up visits from 2014 to 2023.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antiphospholipid antibodies in acute and post-treatment Lyme disease.Infection and immunity · 2026Article
- Evaluation of standard and modified two-tiered testing algorithms using well-characterized early Lyme disease samples.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- Multiplexed single-tier immunoassay for improved Lyme disease diagnosis across all disease stages.Research square · 2026Article
- The multiplexed single-tier InBios Lyme Detect Multiplex ELISA is more sensitive than standard two-tier tests in the early stages of Lyme disease.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Lyme Disease Biobank (LDB) enrolls participants with signs and symptoms of early Lyme disease (LD) from endemic areas and makes samples available to researchers developing more accurate diagnostics. From 2014 to 23, 466 cases and 367 controls were enrolled on Long Island, NY, and in Central Wisconsin. Methods: This study included 253 LDB participants who provided samples from an initial and a convalescent blood draw. Serologic testing, including a first-tier enzyme immunoassay and IgM and IgG immunoblotting, was performed on all samples; blots were interpreted using CDC criteria. Results: At the first draw, 34% of samples from participants presenting with erythema migrans (EM) > 5 cm were positive by CDC's standard two-tiered testing (STTT) algorithm. IgG seroconversion was rare, only 4% of samples demonstrated seroconversion. While the majority of participants (78%) reported no LD symptoms at the second draw, 22% reported ongoing symptoms; the most common being joint pain, fatigue, and muscle pain. Only 35% of participants with ongoing symptoms reported seeing their provider about their symptoms. Conclusion: These results provide additional evidence that STTT is insensitive in early LD and seroconversion is rare after antibiotics. More than one-fifth of participants initially prescribed antibiotics reported ongoing LD symptoms. Therefore, healthcare professionals treating patients with early LD are encouraged to follow-up with their patients, determine whether they continue to experience symptoms, and consider immediate antibiotic re-treatment as appropriate. Early diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of early LD patients has the potential to improve outcomes and reduce the burden of LD in the US.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.