Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40708603›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025

The influence of substitution decisions made by national team coaches on final match outcomes at UEFA EURO 2024.

Tomasz Gabrys, Radoslaw Chruscinski, Michal Garnys, Matej Suva, Karel Švátora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tomasz GabrysSport Centrum Faculty of Education, University of West Bohemia, Pilsen, Czechia.
Radoslaw ChruscinskiDepartment of Sport Science, 4Sport LAB, Warsaw, Poland.
Michal GarnysDepartment of Sport Science, 4Sport LAB, Warsaw, Poland.
Matej SuvaSport Centrum Faculty of Education, University of West Bohemia, Pilsen, Czechia.
Karel ŠvátoraSport Centrum Faculty of Education, University of West Bohemia, Pilsen, Czechia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Coaches leading national football teams during championship tournaments make decisions about tactical substitutions of players in critical match phases. This may be an attempt to change or defend a favorable score. This study focused on the time of decision-making of forced and planned substitutions, considering its characteristics: neutral, offensive, and defensive. The point of analysis of the substitutions was the match outcomes at the time of the substitutions and the final result and impact of the substitution concerning the result. Methods: A total of 51 matches played during the UEFA EURO 2024 football tournament were analyzed, during which 466 player substitutions were made. For the statistical analysis of the degree and strength of the relationship between the variables, the chi-square test, Cramer's V coefficient, and machine learning were used accordingly. Results: 72% of coaches' decisions to player substitutions resulted from the decision to change the team's tactics by changing the team's setup or the players' positions. The most common negative (69%) or positive (61%) impact occurred from the substitution of a player after the 20th minute. Discussion: The decision trees used in the analysis determined the most advantageous time periods for coaches to make decisions about substitutions. The highest substitution effectiveness rate is obtained when the substitution is made between 60 and 85 min, and the lowest is made between 45 and 60 min.

Indexed as

coaching decisionfootball competitiongame strategymachine learningplayer substitutions

Identifiers

PMID40708603
PMCPMC12287015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.