ArticleAIDS care2025
"I'm a really hard stick": barriers, facilitators, and preferences in emergency department HIV testing among people who inject drugs.
Article in AIDS care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Suffolk County, Massachusetts is an Ending the HIV Epidemic priority area with an ongoing cluster of HIV transmission among people who inject drugs, many of whom accessed care in emergency departments prior to diagnosis but were not offered HIV testing. Emergency-department-based HIV testing and pre-exposure prophylaxis initiation have thus become local public health priorities. We conducted a content analysis of in-depth interviews with 26 people who inject drugs recruited from a substance use disorder clinic in Suffolk County serving people who received initial care in the emergency department. Interview questions investigated acceptability, barriers, and facilitators to HIV testing and pre-exposure prophylaxis initiation in the emergency department for people who inject drugs. Mean age was 38y (SD 9.4); 62% were male, with 69% identifying as white and 27% as Latinx. We identified five themes: 1) Support for emergency-department-based HIV testing, 2) Need for multimodal HIV testing, 3) Creating a safe and supportive environment, 4) Pre-exposure prophylaxis misconceptions, and 5) Addressing competing priorities. People who inject drugs are supportive of HIV testing and pre-exposure prophylaxis initiation in emergency departments but acknowledge reasons for declining. Possible modifications to increase acceptance include offering multiple HIV testing modalities and creating safe, confidential spaces to discuss testing and pre-exposure prophylaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.