ArticleInflammatory bowel diseases2025
Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab and Vedolizumab for Crohn's Disease of the Pouch.
Article in Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Essential Updates in the Surgical Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Current Topics From 2024 to Mid-2026.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Review
- Managing Refractory Pouchitis: Which Biologic Is Best?Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsMedically refractory ulcerative colitis may require colectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Complications of the J-pouch include pouchitis, occurring in 50%-80% of patients, and Crohn's disease (CD) of the pouch, occurring in 3%-17%. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab (UST) and vedolizumab (VDZ) in patients with CD of the pouch.
methodsThis was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of adults with CD of the pouch treated with UST or VDZ. The primary outcome was clinical response at 3 or 6 months. Secondary outcomes included clinical remission, endoscopic response, histologic response, pouch failure or surgery, and adverse effects of therapy. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the efficacy and safety of UST versus VDZ, adjusted for age, smoking status, disease duration, corticosteroid use, and antibiotic use. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis evaluated the durability of UST versus VDZ for CD of the pouch.
resultsOne hundred and four patients were included in this analysis. Seventy-seven patients were treated with UST and 57 patients were treated with VDZ between 2011 and 2021. A total of 64/77 (83%) UST-treated patients and 45/57 (79%) VDZ-treated patients had prior biologic exposure. Clinical response occurred in 62% UST-treated patients and 53% VDZ-treated patients at 3 months, and in 56% and 46% at 6 months, respectively. Clinical remission occurred in 32% UST-treated patients and 18% VDZ-treated patients at 3 months and 29% and 21% at 6 months, respectively. Among those treated with UST, 41% achieved endoscopic response, 10% achieved endoscopic remission, 46% achieved histologic response, and 7% achieved histologic remission. Among those treated with VDZ, 27% achieved endoscopic response, 16% achieved endoscopic remission, 26% achieved histologic response, and 8% achieved histologic remission. Over a follow-up period of 3 years, 5% UST-treated patients had inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-related hospitalization, and 9% required pouch-failure surgery. In total, 3% VDZ-treated patients had IBD-related hospitalization and 5% required pouch-failure surgery. Reported adverse effects were uncommon, including arthralgias (1), hair loss (1), syncope (1), and upper respiratory infection (1) for UST and wrist edema (1) and elevated transaminases (1) for VDZ. In multivariable analyses, patients on UST were more likely to have a clinical response compared to VDZ at 3 months (OR 2.73, 95% [CI] 1.13-6.56, P = .025) and 6 months (OR 2.53, 95% CI: 1.01-6.29, P = .046). UST had significantly longer durability of treatment than VDZ (log-rank P < .005).
conclusionsIn one of the largest cohorts evaluating UST and VDZ for CD of the pouch thus far, these biologics were found to be safe and effective treatments for CD of the pouch.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.