Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40708442›Full record

ArticleSmall methods2026

Droplet Impact on Superhydrophobic Surfaces Under High Pressures.

Yan Yan, Zhongqi Liu, Muhammad Amjad, Xiaolong Ma, Dongsheng Wen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Small methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yan YanInstitute of Thermodynamics, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Munich, Germany.
Zhongqi LiuInstitute of Thermodynamics, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Munich, Germany.
Muhammad AmjadInstitute of Thermodynamics, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Munich, Germany.
Xiaolong MaInstitute of Thermodynamics, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Munich, Germany.
Dongsheng WenInstitute of Thermodynamics, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3492-7982

Funding

Bayern High-tech AgendaH2020 European Research Council 101142539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Though numerous studies on droplet impact have been conducted, the maximum ambient pressure reported is limited to 100 bar, and our understanding of droplet behavior under higher pressures remains unexplored. This study presents the first experimental investigation of droplet impact under high ambient pressure (up to 200 bar) onto different superhydrophobic substrates under low Weber number conditions. Four different regimes are identified, i.e., no bouncing, droplet bouncing with both satellite droplet retention and gas entrapment, droplet bouncing with gas entrapment, and complete droplet bouncing. The transition among different regimes is highly dependent on the ambient pressure and substrate topology. The droplet bouncing capability increases with the increase of ambient pressure, and complete bouncing is achieved for all substrates at P ≥ 175 bar. A phenomenological mode is developed taking into the consideration of both enhanced cushioning effect and hydrodynamic impact dynamics at high pressure. With a modified water hammer coefficient, the hydrodynamic impact model can be used to explain the disappearance of satellite droplet. Such work advances droplet study into 200 bar domain, which is of high relevance to a few high-pressure applications such as deep sea oil/water separation.

Indexed as

droplet impactdroplet retentiongas entrapmenthigh pressuresuperhydrophobic substrates

Identifiers

PMID40708442
PMCPMC12893251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.