Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40708337›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2025

Residential greenspace and multiple chronic health conditions in China: a cross-sectional study.

Siyuan Wang, Jingjie Sun, Zhiwei Xu, Gian Luca Di Tanna, Mingsheng Chen, Laura E Downey, Stephen Jan, Lei Si

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Siyuan WangThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Jingjie SunShandong Health Commission Medical Management Service Center, Jinan, China.
Zhiwei XuSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Gian Luca Di TannaDepartment of Business Economics, Health & Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland.
Mingsheng ChenSchool of Health Policy and Management, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Laura E DowneyThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Stephen JanThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Lei SiSchool of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Multiple chronic conditions are imposing an increasing health and economic burden on the Chinese health system. While exposure to residential greenness has been shown to provide various health benefits, its relationship with multiple chronic conditions remains largely unexplored. This study aims to investigate this relationship using high-resolution satellite imagery and data from the 6th Health Services Survey (HSS) cohort in Shandong province. Methods: We linked health data from the HSS with 12-month average Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) measurements based on reported residential geocodes. Multiple chronic condition status was defined as having two or more chronic conditions concurrently, according to the HSS's predefined disease classification. Generalised mixed regression models were utilised to assess both the likelihood and count of multiple chronic conditions in relation to greenspace exposure. Additionally, using the pre-defined disease classes, we also explored how greenspace influences multiple chronic conditions across various physiological systems and disease categories. Results: A total of 28 489 individuals were included in this cross-sectional analysis. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, we found that exposure to greenspace was significantly associated with a reduced prevalence and count of chronic conditions. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for were: Q2 (aOR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.62, 0.88), Q3 (aOR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.55, 0.86), and Q4 (aOR = 0.70; 95% CI = 0.56, 0.88), respectively, compared against the baseline Q1 quartile. Subgroup analyses revealed that higher residential greenspace exposure reduced risks of blood, endocrine, nutritional and metabolic chronic diseases. No clear associations were found for other chronic disease classes. Additionally, consistent results were observed across spatial and temporal sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: Our findings underscore the potential beneficial effects of residential greenness on multiple chronic conditions, with implications for urban planning, environmental policy, and community development.

Indexed as

Multiple Chronic ConditionsParks, RecreationalResidence CharacteristicsAdolescentAdultAgedChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedSatellite ImageryYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40708337
PMCPMC12290433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.