ArticleKorean journal of orthodontics2025
Fractal analysis of mandibular bone structure in individuals with unilateral crossbite.
Article in Korean journal of orthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regional mandibular trabecular alterations in rheumatoid arthritis: a fractal analysis study using panoramic radiographs.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Mandibular trabecular microarchitecture as a radiographic biomarker of bone health in children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to examine the effects of unilateral crossbite on the structure of the mandibular bone by using fractal analysis. Methods: This study was conducted using panoramic films obtained retrospectively from 45 individuals with crossbite and 45 individuals with normal occlusion (NO). Fractal measurements were performed on the condyle, corpus, and angulus on both left and right sides of the panoramic films. The films were divided into three groups: cross-side (Cs), normal-side (Ns), and NO. The Cs group was further analyzed on the basis of the number of teeth in the crossbite. Data were analyzed using the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test and post-hoc Dunnett's T3 multiple-comparison test. Statistical significance was set at Results: The mean condylar fractal dimension (FD) showed no significant difference between the groups ( Conclusions: Fractal analysis may be an effective approach for detecting variations in mandibular trabecular patterns associated with unilateral crossbites. In cases of unilateral crossbite, the trabecular structure was affected in the angulus and corpus regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.