ReviewToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2025
Chemosensory tobacco product toxicology part 1: sensory mechanisms.
Review in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Chemosensory tobacco product toxicology part 2: toxicological testing, assays, and state of the science.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chemosensory systems detect and discriminate a wide variety of molecules to monitor internal and external chemical environments. They initiate olfactory, gustatory, and chemesthetic sensations; influence human brain cognition and emotion; and guide a wide variety of behaviors essential for survival, including protective reactions, such as avoidance of contaminated foods and potential toxicants. Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) aerosolize e-liquids for inhaled consumption that typically contain flavorants, propylene glycol, vegetable glycerin, and nicotine. E-liquid aerosols also contain toxicants, such as formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acrolein, and heavy metals. Chemosensory evaluation of ENDS aerosol plays an essential role in the assessment of whether a product will attract new users of all ages, as well as determining their likely use patterns, perceptions of product harm, satisfaction, and product selection. Nicotine and individual flavorant constituents stimulate multiple sensory receptor systems in complex patterns, initiating distinctive sensory perceptions depending on the chemical properties and quantity in the aerosol. There are limited data on chemosensory evaluation of ENDS aerosols and their influence on ENDS use and protective biologic mechanisms. This two-part manuscript provides an overview of (i) the physiology of the olfactory, gustatory, and chemesthetic chemosensory systems, their detection mechanisms, and their role in protective defenses; and (ii) the in vitro, in vivo, and in silico computer-based methodology available to evaluate ENDS irritants and toxicants, their impact on chemosensory pathways, the current state of the science related to e-liquid and ENDS aerosols, and challenges for future studies and scientific innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.