ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
GRANet: a graph residual attention network for gene regulatory network inference.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- IAGRN: An Interleaved-Attention Graph Neural Network for Gene Regulatory Network Inference.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- SGMHA: semantic graph reconstruction with multi-head attention for gene regulatory network inference.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- CaHoT-GRN: context-aware high-order topology learning for robust single-cell gene regulatory network inference.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Inferring Gene Regulatory Networks From Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data by Dual-Role Graph Contrastive Learning.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- TDAGENE: Inference of Gene Regulatory Network Based on Topological Data Analysis and Graph Attention Network for Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The reconstruction of gene regulatory networks (GRNs) is crucial for uncovering regulatory relationships between genes and understanding the mechanisms of gene expression within cells. With advancements in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technology, researchers have sought to infer GRNs at the single-cell level. However, existing methods primarily construct global models encompassing entire gene networks. While these approaches aim to capture genome-wide interactions, they frequently suffer from decreased accuracy due to challenges such as network scale, noise interference, and data sparsity. This study proposes GRANet (Graph Residual Attention Network), a novel deep learning framework for inferring GRNs. GRANet leverages residual attention mechanisms to adaptively learn complex gene regulatory relationships while integrating multi-dimensional biological features for a more comprehensive inference process. We evaluated GRANet across multiple datasets, benchmarking its performance against state-of-the-art methods. The experimental results demonstrate that GRANet consistently outperforms existing methods in GRN inference tasks. In addition, in our case study on EGR1, CBFB, and ELF1, GRANet achieved high prediction accuracy, effectively identifying both known and novel regulatory interactions. These findings highlight GRANet's potential to advance research in gene regulation and disease mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.