Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40708129›Full record

ReviewEvolutionary anthropology2025

Human-Dog Symbiosis and Ecological Dynamics in the Arctic.

Emma Vitale, Tatiana R Feuerborn, Matthew Walls

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evolutionary anthropology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emma VitaleGlobe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1696-4261
Tatiana R FeuerbornNational Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Matthew WallsUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4687-6297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the Late Pleistocene, humans and dogs have coevolved in the Arctic, forming a symbiotic relationship essential to survival, mobility, and adaptation. Archeological evidence shows dogs were used as traction animals by the Early Holocene, ultimately facilitating Inuit expansion and shaping Arctic settlement patterns. Despite recent declines in sled dog populations due to colonial factors, climate change, and cultural shifts, dogs remain central to Inuit identity. This paper frames the human-dog cooperation as a dynamic system of mutual learning, or enskilment, where both species acquire shared skills through collaboration. Tools like harnesses and whips serve as communicative devices within this system. Drawing on archeological and contemporary Inuit practices, the study highlights how embodied knowledge and animal agency contribute to ecological resilience. By viewing the Arctic as a co-managed landscape shaped by human-dog cooperation, the paper challenges static views of adaptation and underscores the enduring significance of this interspecies relationship.

Indexed as

InuitSymbiosisAnimalsAnthropology, PhysicalArchaeologyArctic RegionsDogsHumansArctic mobilityclimate adaptationcultural heritageembodied learningenskilmenthuman–animal relationsled dogstraditional knowledge

Identifiers

PMID40708129
PMCPMC12290246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.