ReviewAnatomical sciences education2026
A practical guide to using diary methods in qualitative research.
Review in Anatomical sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Folk Sociological Imagination: Manufacturing Agency Through Smoking Among Chinese Adolescents.Sociology of health & illness · 2026Article
- More than words: The value of qualitative research for advancing educational practice.Anatomical sciences education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of qualitative methods is growing in anatomical sciences education. While common qualitative methods such as interviews and focus groups can provide rich insights into participant experiences, there is a wide variety of other qualitative methods that are ideal for different research topics. Research topics that may be emotive or sensitive can be challenging for participants to discuss when face-to-face with a researcher, and thus, methods such as qualitative research diaries can be ideal in circumstances where focus groups and interviews may limit participant engagement and depth of data collection. As diaries are added to over time, they can also be used to understand change and learning. Accordingly, studies using diary methods have substantive potential for furthering anatomical sciences education research. To aid researchers interested in using diary methods, this discursive article provides a practical beginner's guide to qualitative diary studies. First, we review the background and benefits of qualitative diary studies with relevance to health professions and anatomical sciences education. This includes a description of different types of diaries, such as handwritten, typed, audio, and audio-visual diaries. We also discuss key quality indicators to ensure that diary studies are conducted with rigor and ultimately contribute important research findings to advance anatomical sciences education. Drawing on case examples from our own prior health professions education research, we provide practical guidance on how to design and undertake diary studies, including ethical considerations, participant support, and analytical considerations, as well as highlighting challenges that researchers may encounter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.