SynthesisWorldviews on evidence-based nursing2025
The Effectiveness of Patient-Centered Digital Empowerment Programs in Hematological Cancer Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Synthesis in Worldviews on evidence-based nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Effectiveness of Patient-Centered Digital Empowerment Programs in Hematological Cancer Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Worldviews on evidence-based nursing · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence to meet the psychosocial needs of cancer patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHematological cancers impair patients' quality of life (QoL) due to prolonged and complex treatments. Digital empowerment programs enhance patient engagement by supporting symptom management and psychosocial well-being.
aimsThis study was conducted to examine the effects of patient-centered digital empowerment programs on hematological cancer care.
methodsAs part of this study, a comprehensive search was conducted in nine databases and the gray literature in March 2025. The screening included randomized controlled trials without any time restrictions. This study adhered to the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. Fixed-effect and random-effect models were used in the meta-analysis. Cochran's Q chi-square test and I
resultsA total of seven studies were included in this meta-analysis. Patient-centered digital empowerment programs were found to have moderate and positive effects on depression (Hedges' g = 0.27, p < 0.001), distress (Hedges' g = 0.28, p < 0.001), self-efficacy, and QoL (Hedges' g = 0.22, p < 0.001). There was no significant effect on fatigue levels in patients with hematological cancers (p = 0.27), suggesting that digital empowerment programs may not be effective in managing fatigue. The results of the sensitivity analysis support the robustness and reliability of the study findings. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: Digital empowerment programs may serve as a moderately effective tool in improving depression, distress, self-efficacy, and QoL among patients with hematological cancers. However, they exhibit limited effects on physical symptoms, particularly in fatigue management. Therefore, more comprehensive and multidisciplinary interventions are needed to address the management of physical symptoms effectively. Patient-centered digital empowerment programs enable early intervention by assisting healthcare professionals in symptom tracking. Digital solutions enhance care processes by improving patient education, psychosocial support, and self-management skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.