Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40707986›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025

Development and validation of machine learning-based risk prediction models for ICU-acquired weakness: a prospective cohort study.

Yimei Zhang, Yu Wang, Jingran Yang, Qinglan Li, Min Zhou, Jiafei Lu, Qiulan Hu, Fang Ma

Erratum issuedAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yimei ZhangDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, No. 295, Xichang Road, Kunming, 650032, China.
Yu WangDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, No. 295, Xichang Road, Kunming, 650032, China.
Jingran YangDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, No. 295, Xichang Road, Kunming, 650032, China.
Qinglan LiDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, No. 295, Xichang Road, Kunming, 650032, China.
Min ZhouDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, No. 295, Xichang Road, Kunming, 650032, China.
Jiafei LuICU in Geriatric Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, No. 295, Xichang Road, Kunming, 650032, China.
Qiulan HuICU in Geriatric Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, No. 295, Xichang Road, Kunming, 650032, China. 1057385776@qq.com.
Fang MaDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, No. 295, Xichang Road, Kunming, 650032, China. rebeccamalei@126.com.

Funding

"530" Program for Cultivating Reserve Leaders in Academic Disciplines J13397039Department of Science and Technology Planning Project of Yunnan Province in China 202205AC160017Department of Science and Technology Planning Project of Yunnan Province in China 202301AY070001-201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntensive care unit (ICU)-acquired weakness (ICUAW) is a prevalent complication in critically ill patients, marked by symmetrical respiratory and limb muscle weakness, which adversely affects long-term outcomes. Early identification of high-risk patients and prevention are essential to mitigate its impact. Traditional risk prediction models, based on cohort data, have limitations in addressing the complex, non-linear relationships among diverse risk factors due to patient heterogeneity and the dynamic nature of critical illness. Machine learning offers a promising alternative by integrating heterogeneous data-clinical, laboratory, and physiological-to enhance predictive accuracy and individualization. Additionally, machine learning can identify novel risk factors and mechanisms overlooked by conventional methods, supporting early intervention and targeted prevention strategies to improve patient prognosis. Therefore, this study aims to develop and validate risk prediction models for ICUAW based on multiple machine learning algorithms.

methodsFour machine learning algorithms were employed. Bedside ultrasound machines were used to assess ICUAW in patients admitted to the ICU twice, once within 24 hours of ICU admission and once on the 7th day of ICU admission. Eighteen features screened through a previous umbrella review informed the models. The performance of the models was evaluated based on multiple assessment metrics, such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

resultsA total of 749 patients were enrolled in the study, and 382 patients (51%) developed ICUAW. Specifically, 524 patients were assigned to the training set, and 225 patients were assigned to the internal validation set. Among the four machine-learning models, AUC ranged from 0.830 to 0.978. The eXtreme Gradient Boosting exhibited the best performance, achieving an AUC of 0.978 (95%CI 0.962-0.994), with 0.924 accuracy, 0.911 sensitivity, 0.941 specificity, 0.924 F1 score, and a Brier score of 0.084. The results of the Decision Curve Analysis also corroborate these results.

conclusionsA machine learning prediction model can be developed, leveraging its robust learning capabilities to identify patients at high risk of developing ICUAW. This approach facilitates standardized management of ICUAW, thereby potentially reducing its incidence.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsMachine LearningMuscle WeaknessAgedAlgorithmsCritical IllnessFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsROC CurveIntensive care unitMachine learningMuscle weaknessRisk factorsRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID40707986
PMCPMC12288251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.